If a review was posted before the single player was completed and multiplayer was not fully tested, the reviewer would not being doing their job. Not gonna go back and review it post embargo as Feb is packed and Im working on other things. There would be no reason to hold back on code as reviewers would be aware that any online play was not active for review and therefore could not be reviewed. No Hogwarts review from me tonight as I did not receive a review code. This leads me to think Ubisoft knew the game was in pretty bad shape. It’s also worth noting that a reviewer will more than likely look at the online component of a game after the single player is completed. It’s something worth thinking about for the future and I’m sure most PC gamers would welcome this. Hogwarts Legacy looks like a totally immersive Harry Potter experience with a range of everything from taking classes to fighting wizards and goblins in combat with spell combos. If Ubisoft had released an early access version, as has been suggested in the comment, perhaps they would have identified the performance issues before the game hit the shops. The argument of having to have online components active for reviewing purposes doesn’t really cut it because that’s not the main issue with Assassin’s Creed Unity, it’s the game’s bugs and performance that’s been the main criticism.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |